#13784: Move methods from GenericGraph to Graph
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen        |         Owner:  jason, ncohen, rlm
           Type:  defect        |        Status:  needs_review      
       Priority:  major         |     Milestone:  sage-5.6          
      Component:  graph theory  |    Resolution:                    
       Keywords:                |   Work issues:                    
Report Upstream:  N/A           |     Reviewers:  David Coudert     
        Authors:                |     Merged in:                    
   Dependencies:                |      Stopgaps:                    
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment (by dcoudert):

 The patch is OK, and it passes successfully tests on the entire graph
 directory.

 However, when looking at the doc, I saw a very small bug that is not due
 to this patch:
 {{{
     :meth=`~GenericGraph.is_cut_edge` | Returns True if the input edge is
 a cut-edge or a bridge.
 }}}
 Could you fix this missing ":" after ":meth" in this patch, or is it
 better to have a dedicated patch?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13784#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to