#13387: Improve MonoDict and TripleDict data structures
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nbruin          |         Owner:  Nils Bruin  
           Type:  defect          |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.8    
      Component:  memleak         |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                  |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Nils Bruin      |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:  #11521, #12313  |      Stopgaps:              
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by nbruin):

 Replying to [comment:49 SimonKing]:
 > What is the startup_modules script complaining about?

 It's complaining that there seems to be a new module now,
 `sage.structures.gc`. I don't know why that's a bad thing. It's a direct
 consequence of the statement `import gc` that I added, which I need
 because I need to do `gc.enable()` and `gc.disable()`. This is in a
 routine that should rarely execute and has an expensive inner loop that
 doesn't contain these statements, so I don't think the python method calls
 are going to make a difference. Furthermore, I wasn't able to find a
 C-level interface to this functionality. I've checked the source of the
 `GC` module and the underlying C routines are explicitly declared
 `static`, so our only access seems to be via method lookup.

 If someone has a recommended way of accessing this functionality without
 importing gc, that's fine with me. Moving the `import gc` statement into
 runtime, say one of the __init__ methods is a bad idea: Several of these
 dictionaries get instantiated every time a parent's coercion framework is
 initialized (which can be pretty often), but a documented C-level API for
 turning gc on and off would be fine.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13387#comment:50>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to