#14291: Orbits of tuples and sets
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen         |         Owner:  joyner      
           Type:  enhancement    |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-5.9    
      Component:  group theory   |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                 |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A            |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                 |      Stopgaps:              
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > Take, say, directed 3-cycle, and label its vertices, in the cyclic
 order, 1, 2, (1,2). So you get G=Z_3, the automorphism group of this
 digraph, acting on the domain V=(1,2,(1,2)).  Next, ask for the orbit of
 the **arc** (1,2) of the digraph under G. OK, fine, it is
 A=((1,2),(2,(1,2)),((1,2),1). Now, note that the intersection of V and A
 equals {(1,2)}. The intersection of two distinct orbits of a group is not
 empty...

 Ahahaahah. Yeah, it looks like you need to guess somewhere that the
 element (1,2) is not equal to the set containing the two elements 1 and 2
 `:-)`

 > Would Évariste Galois raise from his grave and chase the designer of
 this? :–)

 If he does I will help !

 > > What's the problem with gessing the "depth" of input/output according
 to the value of `action` ?
 >
 > this won't fix the bug above.

 That's true. But the two problems are totally unrelated, though ! In the
 current state of things, guessing the value of action as Volker said and
 translating input/output according to what is what we can do best. Then
 you will have to hand your beloved groups over to the combinat guys who
 will make a hell out of it, and I hope that everything I need from groups
 will be written before they make this impossible to use with their
 parent/element framework.

 Nathann

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14291#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to