#14291: Orbits of tuples and sets
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: joyner
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: group theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:32 ncohen]:
[...]
>
> Ahahaahah. Yeah, it looks like you need to guess somewhere that the
element (1,2) is not equal to the set containing the two elements 1 and 2
`:-)`
easy, as I said: just replace domain elements 1 and 2 by (1) and (2), and
everything all of a sudden works. The alternative is to give yourself over
to the category theory and practice...
>
> > Would Évariste Galois raise from his grave and chase the designer of
this? :–)
>
> If he does I will help !
I won't bet on this, for he might get hold of more powerful weapon than he
used during that unfortunate duel, you know :–)
>
> > > What's the problem with gessing the "depth" of input/output
according to the value of `action` ?
> >
> > this won't fix the bug above.
>
> That's true. But the two problems are totally unrelated, though !
of course they are related, as the code in question works fine on the sane
inputs, and there is nothing to fix then.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14291#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
