#14384: Support version number literals.
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  robertwb         |         Owner:  jason                      
   
           Type:  enhancement      |        Status:  positive_review            
   
       Priority:  major            |     Milestone:  
sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
      Component:  misc             |    Resolution:                             
   
       Keywords:                   |   Work issues:                             
   
Report Upstream:  N/A              |     Reviewers:  David Roe                  
   
        Authors:  Robert Bradshaw  |     Merged in:                             
   
   Dependencies:                   |      Stopgaps:                             
   
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------

Comment (by kini):

 Apparently you have a rather authoritative-sounding voice, Jason :P

 As for the rationale for doing this, well, I can recall approximately the
 conversation which led to this patch:

 >Should we tag our releases as just bare numbers like 5.9 or should we put
 a v in front like v5.9?

 >Well, I think it should be just 5.9 since I'm going to type stuff like
 `vanilla(5.9)` into the Sage prompt and expect it to just work.

 >Is it that much trouble to write `vanilla('v5.9')`... wait, you're going
 to call `vanilla` with a ''float''?

 >Yes! Why not?

 >Well then what about 4.7.2? That isn't a float...

 >True. But it could be an MPFR real! *hack hack*

 >!?

 >Behold, the first git-based trac ticket!

 By the way, Jeroen, I noticed you semi-recently (8 months ago) merged a
 ticket by pulling a branch rather than applying a patch: #418. So while
 this might be the first git-based ticket, it's not the first pull request
 to the modern Sage codebase. Does this mean we could already be using a
 pull-request based model right now, for the Sage library at least? :)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14384#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to