#14384: Support version number literals.
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: jason
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: David Roe
Authors: Robert Bradshaw | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by roed):
Replying to [comment:22 kcrisman]:
> > -1 to going into standard Sage
I'm +1 for going into standard Sage, but I don't feel strongly enough
about it to argue.
> > +1 to going into "cool hacks you can do in Sage"
> If we ever move the useful constructions into the reference manual and
get rid of the constructions thing, we could replace it with "cool Sage
hacks".
Sure.
> > +1 to going into the Sage April Fools collection
> Oh, like the move to Lisp...
I don't think this works as well as an April Fools e-mail, since it's not
actually a very major change. And we'd have to wait almost a year anyway.
;-)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14384#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
