#14492: Modular group cohomology, version 2.1.4
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: packages: optional | Resolution:
Keywords: group cohomology | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Volker Braun
Authors: SimonKing | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:47 jdemeyer]:
> It seems to me that `spkg-check` is essentially reinventing the doctest
framework. Why aren't you using the standard Sage doctest framework?
Originally, my main reason has been to run the tests on a per-method
basis, not on a per-file basis. This concerns
- running tests in parallel,
- the summary of test failures (I would like that the test suite ends with
a list of methods whose tests fail or which appear not to be tested)
- execution time for each test
Also I originally wanted to work around some bugs in the sage-coverage
script: Sometimes the coverage script could not correctly determine the
functions defined in a module.
It could be that in the last three years the doctest and coverage
framework of Sage has improved.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14492#comment:54>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
