#9880: Pynac comparison functions do not provide a SWO
------------------------------------------------------------------+---------
       Reporter:  jpflori                                         |         
Owner:  burcin                          
           Type:  defect                                          |        
Status:  needs_review                    
       Priority:  major                                           |     
Milestone:  sage-5.10                       
      Component:  symbolics                                       |    
Resolution:                                  
       Keywords:  pynac                                           |   Work 
issues:                                  
Report Upstream:  N/A                                             |     
Reviewers:  Burcin Erocal, Jean-Pierre Flori
        Authors:  Burcin Erocal, Jean-Pierre Flori, Volker Braun  |     Merged 
in:                                  
   Dependencies:  #13213                                          |      
Stopgaps:                                  
------------------------------------------------------------------+---------

Comment (by jpflori):

 Thanks Burcin!
 I was finally going to do it today, but you were faster than me.
 At least I can give it a try on beta4 and check there is nothing else to
 fix (all other patches apply cleanly.

 I'd really like other people (let's say at least one) to have a look at
 the new order before you finalize 3.0 (or if it's already finalized/tagged
 in your repo make a 3.1 or 3.0.1) in case we want to make minimal changes.
 E.g. I don't reallylike the following, but do not really mind as well:
 Replying to [comment:77 jpflori]:
 > The only thing which may be a little distrubing is that now we print
 > {{{
 > (2*x+1)*x^2
 > }}}
 > rather than
 > {{{
 > x^2*(2*x+1)
 > }}}
 >
 > This should be easily fixed in pynac hopefully, but even if not I don't
 think it should be a blocker.
 But it would be really better to make these changes, if we plan to make
 them, before merging the ticket, so that people preparing books (I'm
 thinking of the french book which is in the process of being published)
 can expect their examples to pass for a quite long amount of time (or at
 least not to fail in the next version of Sage).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9880#comment:81>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to