#7983: Notion of descent/major index in tableau.py is not mathematically
standard
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: jbandlow | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: combinat, tableaux | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: jbandlow
Authors: arattan, Darij Grinberg | Merged in:
Dependencies: #8392 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Hey Darij,
Two things I notice from a quick lookthrough:
1. `up()` and friends I think should remain where they are because there's
no assumptions made on the initial tableau. However I do think there are
some assumptions about standardness made in their implementation...
2. The reference to Stanley is indented one too many times.
I'll do a more through look-through and we can talk about 1. once I get to
Orsay tomorrow.
Best,[[BR]]
Travis
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7983#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
