#14898: Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt and dual bases
-----------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: deneufchatel | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Matthieu Deneufchâtel | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
-----------------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by deneufchatel):
Make sure all methods you add have docstrings and doctests.
> I will do it as soon as possible (currently, I am in a new flat without
electricty!).
Could you fold all of the patches into a single patch? This makes it
easier to review.
> This is what I wanted to do, but when I followed the method described by
Frédéric Chapoton here (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-
devel/TmkXXg2UW_4) it produced a patch which only contains the
modifications with respect to the previous one. What should I do ?
Set it to "needs_review" when you're ready for someone to do the review.
(which I volunteer)
> Ok, I didn't know who is supposed to do it!
Did you work on this during Sage Days 49? If so, could you add "days49" to
the keywords.
> Well, I got the informations I needed to start modifying Sage source
code during these days, but I did not really work on this patch.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14898#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
