#14234: Restructuring Diagram/Partition Algebras to match category structure
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: ghseeli | Owner:
Type: enhancement | AlexGhitza
Priority: minor | Status:
Component: algebra | needs_review
Keywords: Partition algebra, diagram | Milestone:
algebra, days38, days40 | sage-5.12
Authors: Stephen Doty, Aaron Lauve, | Resolution:
George H. Seelinger | Merged in:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Travis
Branch: | Scrimshaw
Stopgaps: | Work issues:
| Dependencies: #10630
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by darij):
Hi Travis,
thanks, the issues are fixed. I've suggested a little improvement on the
propagating ideal docstring in [attachment:trac_14234-microchange-
dg.patch] which you're free to use or ignore. Basically I think it makes a
lot more sense to think of it as an ideal than as a non-unital algebra.
Greets,\\
Darij
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14234#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
