#14234: Restructuring Diagram/Partition Algebras to match category structure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ghseeli | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: Partition | Merged in:
algebra, diagram algebra, days38, | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw,
days40 | Darij Grinberg
Authors: Stephen Doty, | Work issues:
Aaron Lauve, George H. Seelinger | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
Dependencies: #10630 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
This `AssertionError` should be fixed (you probably want to raise a
`ValueError` instead):
{{{
sage:
sage.combinat.diagram_algebras.to_Brauer_partition([[1,2,3],[-1,-2]])
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssertionError Traceback (most recent call
last)
<ipython-input-1-8bfe84be2a91> in <module>()
----> 1
sage.combinat.diagram_algebras.to_Brauer_partition([[Integer(1),Integer(2),Integer(3)],[-Integer(1),-Integer(2)]])
/mazur/release/merger/sage-5.12.beta1/local/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/sage/combinat/diagram_algebras.pyc in to_Brauer_partition(l, k)
1419 L2.append(list(i))
1420 for i in L2:
-> 1421 assert len(i) < 3
1422 if (len(i) == 2):
1423 paired.append(i)
AssertionError:
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14234#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
