#9107: Nested class name mangling can be wrong in case of double nesting
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  hivert      |        Owner:  nthiery
           Type:  defect      |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major       |    Milestone:  sage-5.12
      Component:  categories  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:              |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Simon King  |    Reviewers:  Volker Braun, Florent Hivert
Report Upstream:  N/A         |  Work issues:
         Branch:              |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #12808      |     Stopgaps:
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:52 SimonKing]:
 > Replying to [comment:51 nthiery]:
 > > For the record: someone else got a similar issue when using sphinx
 [1], and suggested the same fix. Alas this fix does not seem to be enough.
 >
 > What exactly did you do? Change sphinx.sty, as in the source you are
 giving? Or change doc/common/conf.py and misc/latex.py, as advised by
 Travis in comment:47?

 I changed conf.py which properly added it to the generated
 categories.tex file (see the top of that file).

 > Could it be that the following comment from
 [http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-user/2012-May/010144.html the
 page you are citing] applies?
 > {{{
 > However this requires version 3.0 of enumitem, which doesn't yet ship
 > with many linux latex distributions.
 > }}}
 >

 I have 3.5.2 ...

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9107#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to