#9107: Nested class name mangling can be wrong in case of double nesting
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  hivert      |        Owner:  nthiery
           Type:  defect      |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major       |    Milestone:  sage-5.12
      Component:  categories  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:              |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Simon King  |    Reviewers:  Volker Braun, Florent Hivert
Report Upstream:  N/A         |  Work issues:
         Branch:              |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #12808      |     Stopgaps:
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 OK, after getting a more recent version of the enumitem package, I first
 get a "too deeply nested" error on [attachment:categories.tex]. However,
 after doing
 {{{
 \setlistdepth{10}
 }}}
 (and not just depth 9), it compiles fine.

 So, in other words, the problem ''can'' be solved. But I really wonder
 about the requirement that the user has to have a latex installation with
 a very recent enumitem. Can this be really required? Or would we be
 allowed to ship enumitem.sty with Sage?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9107#comment:61>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to