#15143: Improvements to SetPartitions
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #14234 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by zabrocki):
I have some additional doc changes.
I have one additional recommendation. I think you should use the name
`size` instead of `weight`. There was no method before this patch for
computing the size of a set partition, but it could be done indirectly by
`A.to_partition().size()` or `A.to_permutation().size()`. So why call the
"size" in this combinatorial object the "weight" of a set partition?
If you are going to call anything the "weight" of the set partition I
would think it would be the corresponding integer partition (which you
called the "shape").
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15143#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
