#15303: Coercion discovery fails to be transitive
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nbruin | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues: Crash in permgroup.py
Branch: | Commit:
u/SimonKing/ticket/15303 | 807550bbc45e9872ac365fc98b817ccd5bcfbb95
Dependencies: #14711, #15329, | Stopgaps:
#15331 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* work_issues: Crash in permgroup.py; rebase => Crash in permgroup.py
Comment:
I did the deed. That's to say, I changed what in the current workflow is
called "history", but what I think should better be described as "re-
organisation of bits of code in order to facilitate reviewing".
Whatever it is called, two independent issues are tracked at #15329 and
#15331, and the crash in permgroup.py remains a problem.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15303#comment:85>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
