#13394: Write a WeakValueDictionary with safer key removal
-------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  nbruin       |        Owner:  rlm
           Type:  enhancement  |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major        |    Milestone:  sage-5.13
      Component:  memleak      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:               |    Merged in:
        Authors:               |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A          |  Work issues:
         Branch:               |       Commit:
   Dependencies:               |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:6 nbruin]:
 > If instead you "inline" the tuples by making the bucket a list with the
 layout `[key1, weakref_to_value1, key2, weakref_to_value2,...]` you can
 save yourself some overhead.

 Good point.

 In addition, I think that `weakref_to_value_n.key` used for the callback
 should be improved: Storing `hash(key_n)` should be enough. Namely, it
 allows to find the correct hash bucket, and then the hash bucket is
 searched to find `weakref_to_value_n` that is subject to the callback. The
 latter is simply comparing memory addresses.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13394#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to