#14711: Weak references in the coercion graph
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jpflori | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.0
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: memleak, number | Merged in:
field, QuadraticField | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Work issues: Fix doctests errors
Report Upstream: N/A | after merging master
Branch: | Commit:
u/SimonKing/ticket/14711 | d68c5df4618cc4fcf8ef215ee6b2f475be028209
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Too bad. We ''have'' to have `check=True` by default (that's convention in
Sage). And since schemes are no unique parents, comparison of schemes will
generally involve Gröbner basis computations.
I only hope that in this particular application we ''know'' that we are
dealing with good input and thus can set `check=False`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14711#comment:151>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
