#13312: Polyhedral bugfixes and improvements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mhampton           |        Owner:  mhampton
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  geometry           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  polyhedra, polar   |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Marshall Hampton,  |    Reviewers:
  Volker Braun                       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  9e2fe957e16c53fe39df2d58cb739b0dc416bfd6
  u/vbraun/polyhedral_neg_polar      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #11763             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yooooooooooooo !!

 I agree with this patch, though I don't understand one bit : why this
 change in `.polar` ?

 {{{
 #!python
 -  verts = [list(v.vector() - self.center()) for v in
 self.vertex_generator()]
 +  verts = [list(self.center() - v.vector()) for v in
 self.vertex_generator()]
 }}}

 If it is just to have your example of code work, shouldn't you change the
 constructor instead ?

 By the way, running `polytopes.n_cube(3).show()` just gives me a black
 Jmol window. I mean, empty. It's like the world is missing a cube.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13312#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to