#13312: Polyhedral bugfixes and improvements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: mhampton
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: polyhedra, polar | Merged in:
Authors: Marshall Hampton, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Volker Braun | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 9e2fe957e16c53fe39df2d58cb739b0dc416bfd6
u/vbraun/polyhedral_neg_polar | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #11763 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Nathann Cohen
Comment:
Oh sorry. I thought that you just changed the result of this `.polar()`
thing so that the two constructors would be equal, and not just
isomorphic. I was saying that instead of changing the behaviour of this
function to get this result, you should just multiply one of the two
constructors by `-1` which would appear more correct `:-P`
Okayokay, then if this def of `polar` is the good one, this patch is good
to go as all other additions seem good too `;-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13312#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
