#15588: Cleanup of integer_mod_ring.py
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.1
      Component:  doctest coverage   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/rings/cleanup_integer_mod_ring|  
0e1a46b94e5094921fe35561e75c9369d7cd7d92
   Dependencies:  #15369             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:3 tscrim]:
 > I just get annoyed when there's something like:
 > {{{
 > if cond:
 >     special/small case
 >     return foo
 > else:
 >     a long code block
 >     return foobar
 > }}}
 You may be annoyed by that style, but I am annoyed by people rewriting
 code for no other reason than it suits their own personal style. When it's
 newly added code, it makes sense to have a good consistent style. But I
 don't think you should rewrite existing code into a particular style. But
 since I'm not the reviewer of this ticket, you're free to ignore this
 opinion.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15588#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to