#12630: Add representations of quivers and quiver algebras to sage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: JStarx | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: algebra, quiver, | Merged in:
module, days49 | Reviewers: Simon King
Authors: Jim Stark, Simon | Work issues:
King, Mathieu Guay-Paquet, Aladin | Commit:
Virmaux | 72fb2eb71459f4ac76b0d922a7ad788c660a8017
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/SimonKing/ticket/12630 |
Dependencies: #12412, #12413, |
#14806, #15491, #15623 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> - .semigroup(),that returns the (partial) semigroup formed by the paths-
with-composition, and
> - .algebra(), that would be a short-cut for .semigroup().algebra()
>
> This is a question mainly to Nathann: Could you live with two additional
methods for `DiGraph`? I think the discussion on this ticket suggest the
answer "yes", but to be on the safe side I'm asking again...
If you can tell me honestly that there exists only one way to associate a
semigroup to a digraph, then no problem with semigroup. Is that the case ?
Same question for algebra. Is that the case ? But for this one I do not
see the point of creating an alias when the normal way to access the
algebra is to call it on `.semigroup()`.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12630#comment:154>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
