#12630: Add representations of quivers and quiver algebras to sage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: JStarx | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: algebra, quiver, | Merged in:
module, days49 | Reviewers: Simon King
Authors: Jim Stark, Simon | Work issues:
King, Mathieu Guay-Paquet, Aladin | Commit:
Virmaux | 72fb2eb71459f4ac76b0d922a7ad788c660a8017
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/SimonKing/ticket/12630 |
Dependencies: #12412, #12413, |
#14806, #15491, #15623 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by nthiery):
* changetime: 01/30/14 06:55:18 => 01/30/14 06:55:18
Comment:
Hi Nathann, Simon,
Just random suggestions. Adding those methods to digraphs sounds
reasonable, with slightly more explict names like
{{{Q.path_semigroup()}}} and {{{Q.path_algebra()}}}. The latter could
possibly be {{{Q.path_semigroup().algebra(QQ)}}}.
For {{{Q.all_paths()}}}, it depends on the meaning. If it's about
listing the paths, we can just do {{{Q.path_semigroup().list()}}}. If
it's about modelling the set of paths, but without the (partial)
semigroup structure given by concatenation, then {{{Q.paths()}}} seems
reasonable.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12630#comment:157>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
