#12630: Add representations of quivers and quiver algebras to sage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  JStarx             |        Owner:  AlexGhitza
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  algebra            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  algebra, quiver,   |    Merged in:
  module, days49                     |    Reviewers:  Simon King
        Authors:  Jim Stark, Simon   |  Work issues:
  King, Mathieu Guay-Paquet, Aladin  |       Commit:
  Virmaux                            |  72fb2eb71459f4ac76b0d922a7ad788c660a8017
Report Upstream:  N/A                |     Stopgaps:
         Branch:                     |
  u/SimonKing/ticket/12630           |
   Dependencies:  #12412, #12413,    |
  #14806, #15491, #15623             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yoooooooo !

 > In the current code, it ''is'' stored in a (Python) list, and I totally
 agree
 > that this is bad.

 `O_o`

 What can you do with the `*list*` of paths ? Even checking whether a path
 is in the list is probably faster by using the graph itself `O_o`

 > But I want to see this code move forward, and the code has
 > been refactored often enough.

 'f you say so...

 > So, I want a preliminary but slow version (that apparently is useful to
 > people, or otherwise Jim Stark had not provided the code) and then
 replace it
 > with something faster.

 Are you open to "bets" on the meaning of "later" ? `:-P`

 > I have an implementation using two different kinds of storing it as
 `*long`,
 > in compressed form. In both implementations, concatenation, comparison
 and
 > sub-path test are fast enough for me...

 Oh. It is already implemented. Then I guess the "later" may not be too
 far.

 > But this will be on a new ticket, since otherwise I don't see a chance
 of
 > progress here.

 ts'up to you !

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12630#comment:169>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to