#15998: Restore some documentation and doctests and a function removed with
#15466
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Darij Grinberg | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/combinat/re-15466 | 3cda807d8227c794f798a5432289b27200b870cb
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
@Nathann: Wasn't you who pointed out on the mailing list a while ago that
the deprecation message was wrong? This has nothing to do with
`PartitionTuples` and, as far as I know, the functionality isn't anywhere
in Sage. The other deprecation messages aren't any more reliable (there
was a method whose deprecation message pointed to itself).
@Travis: What you're doing currently computes the cardinality by iterating
through all of these partitions. This doesn't scale *at all*. I've thought
about overshadowing `cardinality`, but then I would need to make a new
class for partitions of given size and given length; is that worth the
hassle? (Also, I feel that module-level functions can sometimes be better
than class methods: imagine having to build tons of classes to compute
several values of the partition function...)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15998#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
