#15976: IntegerLattice class
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: linear algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Martin Albrecht | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/15976 | e0f6e3c9dce8568e4d27201c35d7fbbfad1e1b88
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:27 malb]:
> Wouldn't people confuse that with vector lattices? Or is that not a
common notion? cf. http://www.stat.yale.edu/~pollard/Books/Asymptopia/old-
Vectorlattice.pdf
>
> I do have to admit that I also find it a bit awkward but that's clearly
a question of taste.
hmm, OK, how about `AdditiveTorsionFreeAbelianGroup` ? This would avoid
that other lattices all together...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15976#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
