#15300: Weyl and Clifford Algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: days54 | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/algebras/weyl_clifford-15300| de4cc8c2be64048a1f38fe7ce3b91985d62992ca
Dependencies: #16037 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
I have done some improvements on the interior product. But I still need to
reiterate my question: How is the interior product defined? You define it
only when one of the two factors (the "smaller" one) is a single vector;
but the method is defined for any two wedges. You seem to be reading the
factor left-to-right, but a point can be made for the opposite convention.
If you can give a reference, that's fine -- just please let's not leave
this undocumented.
Should I generally use identity to compare base rings? I thought equality
was more robust, or can we assume parents to be UniqueRepresentation?...
Sorry for ongoing lameness; I got some kind of cold again and my QSym
paper is not progressing :/
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=de4cc8c2be64048a1f38fe7ce3b91985d62992ca
de4cc8c]||{{{another try at sphinx}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15300#comment:73>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
