#2516: generalized hypergeometric functions should be implemented
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ddrake | Owner: cwitty
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: hypergeometric | Merged in:
Authors: Fredrik | Reviewers: Ralf Stephan
Johansson, Eviatar Bach, Ralf | Work issues:
Stephan | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | ebe4c6a12c88cf6fdf0e7eb7b43bcfe05dcab8a4
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/rws/generalized_hypergeometric_functions_should_be_implemented|
Dependencies: #14858 #14780 |
#9556 #14802 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by rws):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Fixed all doctests. Please review. I had to exclude the hypergeometric
function from random symbolic tests as that code blindly applies real
numbers as parameters, and I didn't want to add `try: ... except
ValueError: pass` there.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2516#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
