#2516: generalized hypergeometric functions should be implemented
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ddrake | Owner: cwitty
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: hypergeometric | Merged in:
Authors: Fredrik | Reviewers: Ralf Stephan
Johansson, Eviatar Bach, Ralf | Work issues:
Stephan | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | bc1d66efab841c4670bc9e07f6b5c0e4a580e0dd
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/nbruin/ticket/2516 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by rws):
* commit: ebe4c6a12c88cf6fdf0e7eb7b43bcfe05dcab8a4 =>
bc1d66efab841c4670bc9e07f6b5c0e4a580e0dd
Comment:
Replying to [comment:40 nbruin]:
> A better solution would be to adapt the routine
`ext.fast_callable.function_name` (or the way it gets used). It's clear
you're now feeding it things it wasn't designed for.
Yes but how to distinguish such a 'dynamical' expression from
`Expression`? The type displayed
(`sage.functions.hypergeometric.Expression_with_dynamic_methods`) cannot
be tested for directly. To do it right it should not be hypergeometric-
specific either.
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=bc1d66efab841c4670bc9e07f6b5c0e4a580e0dd
bc1d66e]||{{{trac 2516: fix maxima_lib to properly translate
hypergeometric}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2516#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
