#15801: Categories over a base ring category
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/categories/over-a-base- | d396719ca5442e41259b16f43994e87099fdfcea
ring-category-15801 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #10963 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:25 tscrim]:
> Replying to [comment:23 nthiery]:
> Okay, I'm happy as long as we're getting things like this:
> > {{{
> > Modules(Groups().Algebras(Groups().Algebras()))
> > }}}
> for things like `(QQ[G])[H]` where `G,H` are groups.
For now the group algebra construction still uses categories over base
rings. But yes, that's what would happen otherwise.
Thanks for the feedback!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15801#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
