#15801: Categories over a base ring category
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/categories/over-a-base- | 1f09b8bde256c00bab2359e799b88e9da2273720
ring-category-15801 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #10963 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:29 tscrim]:
> I've merged in the latest #10963, made some misc doctweaks (added some
doctests to/near functions were editing), fixed an issue with
`Sets.Algebras` not taking a category (so `GroupAlgebras(Rings())` used to
fail). If you're happy with my changes, then I think this part is a
positive review.
Cool, thanks! Please proofread my proofreading :-)
I have merged the latest #10963 since I was not sure it would not conflict
with my changes.
Running all doctests now with the little tweak from #15919.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15801#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
