#16269: Cartesian Products of additive groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Reviewers:
Nicolas M. Thiéry | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16269 | aa07ba19487569ef26772c51092c4d5342faff7c
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> Is it because #10963 will take forever to merge, as it has apparently
hit some kind of OSS unsolvability barrier? :)
I have no idea what #10963 contains, nor do I care to be honest. And about
implementing rings, I would personally chose to behave as if #10963 were
to never be merged, because you just can't count on stuff like this to
happen `:-P`
> If I were a category theorist and a (C)Python guru by training, perhaps
it will only take me 5 minutes ;-)
Which is why I lived very hard the last 2 days, during which I tried to
implement a ten-lines patch that would have taken any of the so-called
"category theorist and a (C)Python guru by training" those 5 minutes.
Besides, I don't consider the product of additive group to be such a weird
notion that it could be left unimplemented for years `:-P`
But well. Now it is done in this patch. Stuff happens.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16269#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
