#16269: Cartesian Products of additive groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Reviewers:
Nicolas M. Thiéry | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16269 | d22e245049e26dd10522d3514603868701a286fb
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:18 ncohen]:
> Here I do not agree. This is the most natural definition of an "iter"
for a cartesian product. Your application will overrule this anyway, so
how can that be a problem ?
Ah shoot, in the mean time I answered your private e-mail about this
:-) Shall I copy paste my answer here?
> I personally see no problem in removing this catch, knowing that
cartesian products of `FiniteEnumeratedSet` will fail. For me it is
because of a bug in `FiniteEnumeratedSet`, not of what I implement.
I agree.
If this special situation is not used too much elsewhere (i.e. if all
test pass), then I'd say let's go. And if not, I guess we will need to
fix/workaround the problem in FiniteEnumeratedSet.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16269#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
