#15310: Wilson's construction of Transversal Designs/Orthogonal Arrays/MOLS
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  d74341411288315f13da3d4383e515b884ba7440
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/15310         |
   Dependencies:         |
  #15287, #15431         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > It was! But on the other hand there is a serious issue in #16227.
 > The function Wilson construction and TD_product should be similar but
 they are not.

 Since when are such things called serious ? `:-P`

 Besides I implemented one months after the other, so if you do not mind...
 :-P

 > Wilson call the `transversal_design` to start the construction but you
 have to feed `TD_product` with the designs! Why is that?

 Because I suspect that TD_product may be useful to the users later to
 compute products of their own designs (not the one Sage knows) and I did
 not think this would happen with wilson decompsition.... If we make
 TD_product call the designs itself, it makes it less useful, that's all. I
 saw one as "internal stuff" while the other  one could eventually become
 useful for users.

 > I think it would make more sense to merge the two tickets
 simultaneously.

 Why ?

 > Would you mind if we move the changes you introduced in #16227 in this
 one (I can even do that by myself).

 Well, stuff is based on the TD ticket, and I will have to deal with the
 conflicts later if any, so if I can avoid it ....

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15310#comment:43>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to