#15310: Wilson's construction of Transversal Designs/Orthogonal Arrays/MOLS
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.2
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | d74341411288315f13da3d4383e515b884ba7440
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/15310 |
Dependencies: |
#15287, #15431 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
I guess that Brett comment is right. If you focus on constructing more
TD/OA/MOLS (which is a fair) you should remove the optional TD arguments
from the `TD_product`. Do not think about other users, they can think by
themselves :-P. I will copy/paste that on #16227.
Brett might be the well designed person to implement a nice class to deal
with OA. From that we can start having nicer support for product of
individual OA.
My conclusion is: I think that this ticket is good to go as it is, but I
would like that Brett gives his green light.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15310#comment:46>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
