#16277: MOLS constructions rom the Handbook of Combinatorial Designs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/ncohen/16277 | Commit:
Dependencies: #16248, #16231, | d4f445b189ad16b28a436d9fd2fe82db53ebf3b1
#16269, #16058 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:8 ncohen]:
> > 4) (semi-stupid remark) For the 6 construction of OA from Vmt, the
function is rather trivial. One way to avoid duplication is to modify the
dictionnary into `n -> (k, constructor, extra_args)`. For the Vmt the
entries would look like
> > {{{
> > OA_constructions = {
> > ...
> > 46: (6, OA_from_Vmt, (4,9,[0, 1, 3, 2, 8])),
> > 50: (8, OA_from_Vmt, (6,7,[0, 1, 3, 16, 35, 26, 36])),
> > ...
> > }
> > }}}
>
> If we do that the OA will be built when Sage starts. Plus I would like
to thank Julian R. Abel somewhere.
Agreed. And it is better to test the corresponding code in the docstring
of the function.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16277#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
