#16277: MOLS constructions rom the Handbook of Combinatorial Designs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/ncohen/16277 | Commit:
Dependencies: #16248, #16231, | 490aa7e9c919ef8bd62d9da41489c3825ff14f72
#16269, #16058 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> In the doctest, I would like to see:
Hey man, what you "would like to see" takes me 20 minutes each time....
> {{{
> sage: TD = TD_6_12()
> sage: TDbis = designs.transversal_design(6,12)
> sage: TD == TDbis
> True
> }}}
WHAT IS THE POIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINT ????
> It is worth it to see if the individual designs are actually used in the
construction, isn't it? Even if the answer is `False` at some point, it
still makes sense to keep the function and the doctest.
Who cares ? The function checks that the designs returned are good, and it
checks that they are available through the main entry point. It already
takes 30 seconds to check this file ! You want to double it to check ...
that ?
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16277#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
