#16272: redesign transversal designs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: Vincent Delecroix
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: designs, | Merged in:
orthogona arrays | Reviewers:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/16272 | 47798d2d54221c0bd0ce6aa75d1900496a091e2f
Dependencies: #15310, #16227, | Stopgaps:
#16281 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> This is what I did not want to do... if `k=n+1` and `projective_plane`
answers `Unknown` you are going to try other constructions. In comment:38
you said that it was useless...
Oh right. But that was to avoid having a `who_asks` parameter in
`projective_plane`. But anyway, it does not cost too much and if by chance
we got one we would be happy! Ahahaha. Yeah. Perhaps somebody overlooked a
very simple case of recursive decomposition `;-)`
> Who is the author? who is the reviewer? who sets to positive review?
Well, let's do half/half. Positive review with both reviewers and both
authors. By the way I just finished the patch for `k=None` and I added the
MOLS table from my dreams. The last dependency of the constructions will
also be reviewed in a second `;-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16272#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
