#16272: redesign transversal designs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:  Vincent Delecroix
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  designs,           |    Merged in:
  orthogona arrays                   |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  public/16272       |  d81f265637099f93495dafac54e2d354be0d66d5
   Dependencies:  #15310, #16227,    |     Stopgaps:
  #16281                             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Replying to [comment:48 ncohen]:
 > Yooooooooooo !!
 >
 > I understand that you do not want to call the same function twice, but
 would you mind behaving as if boolean results were already cached ? It
 really makes the code's flow easier to follow `:-/`

 I do not care too much about calling twice the function. My main trouble
 was that in `OA` with parameters `n,k=n+1,t=2` we have equivalence with
 projective planes. So we need to let the projective plane do what it has
 to do (even if the answer is Unknown). Whereas for general `n,k,t=2` we
 might have something better but it still worth it to ask about a
 projective plane... If you have an idea to make it neat I let it to you.

 > Otherwise everything looks right... If I may ask, I think it would also
 be better to not have this `TD = designs.transversal_design` in the
 doctest. Keeping the full writing also helps explaining to the users that
 all the TD can be built from `designs.transversal_design`.

 Cool (Note that the doc problem is fixed).

 We leave the idea of having an optional `k=None`? Might be an independent
 ticket anyway.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16272#comment:51>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to