#16272: redesign transversal designs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: Vincent Delecroix
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: designs, | Merged in:
orthogona arrays | Reviewers:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/16272 | 5074eee1d802ef44c251252581684bf1dc1dc7d6
Dependencies: #15310, #16227, | Stopgaps:
#16281 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yooooooooooo !!
I understand that you do not want to call the same function twice, but
would you mind behaving as if boolean results were already cached ? It
really maked the code's flow easier to follow `:-/`
Otherwise everything looks right... If I may ask, I think it would also be
better to not have this `TD = designs.transversal_design` in the doctest.
Keeping the full writing also helps explaining to the users that all the
TD can be built from `designs.transversal_design`.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16272#comment:48>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
