#10963: Axioms and more functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: stumpc5
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: days54 | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream: N/A | Chapoton, Darij Grinberg, Travis
Branch: | Scrimshaw
public/ticket/10963-doc- | Work issues: To be merged
distributive | simultaneously with #15801
Dependencies: #11224, #8327, | Commit:
#10193, #12895, #14516, #14722, | 8da7522b983fd9a5bdc3680615e6a4b2094bab10
#13589, #14471, #15069, #15094, | Stopgaps:
#11688, #13394, #15150, #15506, |
#15757, #15759, #16244, #16269 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:783 SimonKing]:
> Replying to [comment:775 nthiery]:
> > - Deeply nested classes are not properly supported by Sphinx (waiting
> > for #9107 which is basically done)
>
> I thought #9107 is ''causing'' a problem with the (pdf) docs?
Yup: #9107 makes it so that deeply nested classes are finally
included in the documentation (which is good), but as a side effect the
produced latex does not compile yet because deep list nesting is not
supported by default by latex. I
said "basically done" because the little plan I sketched on sage-devel
should be good enough to fix this, and I will take care of it soon
once this is merged.
On a related matter, it would be cool to have folding in the html
documentation; but that's another story.
> OK. Probably I will re-revert it (or do it properly) in #16296, though
`:-P`
Thinking twice about it, you are right: we should just do it properly in a
followup to #15801. Indeed we anyway want to add support for:
{{{
sage: Modules(Rings()).example()
}}}
So I am just leaving things as they are now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:785>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
