#16320: Handle finite slices for infinite enumerate sets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: infinite | Merged in:
enumerated set slices | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | e069b7de8e84c84978db760833a675c161173287
public/infinite_enum_set_slices-16320| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:7 tscrim]:
> How about we just use `unrank`? Alternatively perhaps `slice` or
`range`?
Using `unrank` puts more burden on subclasses that implement `unrank`:
they would also need to take care of slices. Having a separate method for
slices makes it easy to, e.g. provide default implementations for `slice`
in term of `unrank` (or in term of `unrank` and `next` or ...).
Other than this, I have no particular preference yet. Another possibility:
`unrank_range`.
Cheers,
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16320#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
