#16320: Handle finite slices for infinite enumerate sets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: infinite | Merged in:
enumerated set slices | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | e069b7de8e84c84978db760833a675c161173287
public/infinite_enum_set_slices-16320| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Helloooooooo !!!
> 1) This is a generic implementation (i.e. think in an abstract class),
so I can't do anything about when it's overwritten except possibly adding
it in in each of those classes directly (which I don't want to do). I
would instead recommend having those classes implement `unrank`, if also
to avoid ambiguity with things like `ZZ['x']`.
>
> 2) Done.
Okayokay, then the result is good to me.. Too bad we cannot solve this
once and for all `:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16320#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
