#12630: Add representations of quivers and quiver algebras to sage
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: JStarx | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: algebra | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: algebra, quiver, | Merged in:
module, days49 | Reviewers: Simon King, Travis
Authors: Jim Stark, Simon | Scrimshaw
King, Mathieu Guay-Paquet, Aladin | Work issues:
Virmaux | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
f3402ef849622e1f5a7d88205c2911ecd6d03ffa|
Dependencies: #12412, #12413, |
#14806, #15491, #15623, #15810 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
Personally, I disagree (noncommutative base rings scare me, even as a
noncommutative algebraist), but this is a tough question. For me, the base
ring is the ring everything in sight is linear over (including
noncanonical splittings and other auxiliary constructs). Whether QQ or
QQ['t'] is the base ring of QQ['t']^3 should really be up to the user to
decide, not up to Sage; it depends on what one is doing. It being an
attribute is a structural weakness of Sage that will bite us if we start
doing serious algebra.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12630#comment:273>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
