#15921: work around Maxima fpprintprec bug and other ARM-specific problems
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: Maxima, | Merged in:
fpprintprec, ARM | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Reported | Commit:
upstream. Developers acknowledge | 079bb9af4f12892268a19f0d218ac96bd72466f4
bug. | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/dimpase/arm_fixes_etc |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:22 pbruin]:
> See attachment. I also discovered (by comparing with PARI) that the
output of the Bessel function was in fact less correct (on both ARM and
x86_64) than the doctest suggested. I changed the output to match the
actual value instead of Maxima's approximation, and added a suitable `rel
tol` marker. Is there a general rule saying whether one should resolve
such discrepancies like this?
perhaps, report upstream? By the way, do you know whether Maxima uses
double precision CL floats in that kinds of functions?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15921#comment:23>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
