#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Work issues:
Vincent Delecroix | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | a5c4dbc9d1b77315d90dd3dd7a8ccea780f59ecf
Branch: public/16553 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> There is right now the possibility of having repeated elements in the
blocks.
`>_<`
> The `block_design_checker(binary=True)` answers if it is. It is used
nowhere... what should we do with that?
Let's remove this. It does not appear in what is commonly accepted as an
incidence structure. Those things are meant to be sets.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
