#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Work issues:
Vincent Delecroix | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | d69700920609cd6112d2496b8858f94da3642531
Branch: public/16553 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> This one is a `0-(4,0,3)` design
> And this one is a `0-(4,1,2)` design
> And this one is a `1-(4,1,1)` design
....
Well, that's hardly a problem, is it ? Handling the trivial cases is
usually done separately at the beginning of the function
> I broke it into several pieces in order to allow an argument `t` to the
function.
....
What about this ?..
{{{
- for t in range(2,min(v,k+1)):
+ for t in (range(2,min(v,k+1)) if t is None else [t]):
}}}
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:51>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
