#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen,     |  Work issues:
  Vincent Delecroix                  |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  b51512d642a603ea91d9358ea3d7877f184938d0
         Branch:  public/16553       |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Hi Nathann,

 Sorry, I was being stupid... With the last commit, it is back to normal.

 I still have a `_t_design_parameters(self,t)` (that only depends on `t`)
 and a `is_t_design(self,t,v,k,l)`. We can always make only one function
 using an "output wrapper":
 {{{
 def make_the_output_the_user_want(t,v,k,l,vv,tt,kk,ll,return_parameters):
     ....
 }}}
 but I prefer the current version. Better idea?

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to