#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Work issues:
Vincent Delecroix | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | d69700920609cd6112d2496b8858f94da3642531
Branch: public/16553 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> and then
> {{{
> sage: BD = designs.IncidenceStructure(4)
> sage: BD.points().append(19)
> sage: BD.points()
> [0, 1, 2, 3, 19]
> }}}
> Should we do a copy each time somebody asked for points?
That's hardly a problem if we do a copy for blocks anyway. Plus one can
directly access `._points` to avoid that. But agreed, it's not a very bad
problem anyway.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
