#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Work issues:
Vincent Delecroix | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | b51512d642a603ea91d9358ea3d7877f184938d0
Branch: public/16553 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:61 ncohen]:
> > I do not understand your point, in [comment:58] you proposed
`is_t_design(self,t,v,k,l)`. Now, you want to keep the
`return_parameters=False/True`. Fine, but it will be ugly if you make only
one function.
>
> I never had anything again `return_parameters` flags `O_o`
>
> That's what I always do when I need a test function which can also
return useful information it already computed...
>
> > If you want to propose some code, do it! I am lost!
>
> Ahahah. And how do you think I am ? Your branch has something like 8
commits that undo each other, and you still haven't answered important
things like : why do you convert everything to tuples ???
>
> Do you mind if I rewrite history just a bit and merge all your commits
into one, on top of #16466 ?
fine.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:62>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
